File:Detailed SVG map of the Hispanophone world.svg
Size of this PNG preview of this SVG file: 512 × 260 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 163 pixels | 640 × 325 pixels | 1,024 × 520 pixels | 1,280 × 650 pixels | 2,560 × 1,300 pixels.
Original file (SVG file, nominally 512 × 260 pixels, file size: 645 KB)
 | The factual accuracy of this map or the file name is disputed.
Reason: In areas of Spain and Mexico, Spanish is also co-official. |  |
Summary
| Description |
English:
Official language
Co-official language
Minority language (more than 20% Spanish speakers) Español: Idioma oficial
Idioma cooficial
Idioma minoritario (hablado por más del 20% de la población) |
| Date | |
| Source |
|
| Author | Jpthefish |
| Other versions |
|
.svg)
Licensing
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 17:58, 19 January 2024 | | 512 × 260 (645 KB) | Moalli | Recent Aruban census data showing less than 20% Spanish speakers is not neutral? This is literally fitting the map's legend |
| 03:26, 16 January 2024 |  | 512 × 260 (893 KB) | Salvabl | Reverted to version as of 01:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC) There is no consensus to remove Aruba. If we were to do this because there are less than 20% Spanish speakers, Mauritania should also be removed from the map of the French language; otherwise there would be a lack of neutrality. The appropriate thing to do in these cases where the language is sufficiently relevant even if it does not reach 20% of speakers is to mark the country with a dot. | |
| 15:17, 11 January 2024 |  | 512 × 260 (645 KB) | Moalli | Rmv Aruba, most recent census data shows less than 20% Spanish speakers | |
| 01:35, 27 December 2023 |  | 512 × 260 (893 KB) | Kwamikagami | there is no consensus to make an exception for the Philippines in the first place | |
| 16:45, 24 December 2023 |  | 512 × 260 (891 KB) | Salvabl | Reverted to version as of 21:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC) There is not sufficient consensus to gray the Philippines entirely. | |
| 02:57, 24 December 2023 |  | 512 × 260 (893 KB) | Kwamikagami | rv to status-quo ante: Spanish is no more important in the Philippines than French is in Vietnam. The number of speakers is miniscule. | |
| 21:29, 18 December 2023 |  | 512 × 260 (891 KB) | Salvabl | Reverted to version as of 00:39, 9 October 2023 (UTC) That extremely tiny dot violates WP:ACCESSIBILITY. In addition, it was added unilaterally without prior consensus. | |
| 06:12, 11 October 2023 |  | 2,532 × 1,284 (841 KB) | Moalli | Don't unilaterally highlight PH as it has been agreed upon that shading the entire country is misleading and that the current dot is a placeholder until other possible color schemes (if any) are agreed upon. The situation is similar to Czech Rep on German maps regarding cultural presence vs Louisiana on French map (where it's official to some degree). | |
| 00:39, 9 October 2023 |  | 512 × 260 (891 KB) | Salvabl | Reverted to version as of 13:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC) On world language maps where there is a cultural presence, the entire territory is usually highlighted (as for example Louisiana or New Hampshire on the French language-related maps). Nevertheless, I think there may be other options (such as the use of dots) that would help the map gain accuracy, but this requires discussion, and reaching a common consensus, which does not exist in this case. The solution is not just to turn gray the entir... | |
| 05:27, 18 August 2023 |  | 2,532 × 1,284 (841 KB) | Moalli | On world language maps where there is a cultural presence/influential minority, the standard has been to place a dot or square on the concerned country, usually on the largest city or capital. Highlighting it entirely when it's not used in administrative settings or as the secondary language is blatant misrepresentation and POV-esque. Please see discussion on proposals to accurately map PH, but do not highlight the whole country, as that is not accurate. |
File usage
There are no pages that use this file.
